The importance of values, the need for value education, the
persistent lament about the gradual demise of values, the very sharply
different sets of values that seem to clash constantly all over the world…
these are issues that have exercised my mind constantly, and I have written off
and on about them, even here on this blog (see, for example, Moral Science, Values, prices, incomes and Indian values are coming). The discussions are forever interesting, but the
solutions seem to be forever elusive.
Why?
Well, I have found some answers to the ‘why’, at least. It
all begins, it seems to me, with what men
want out of life in this world.
There are those who simply wanted happiness, have given up
on it, and believe that from birth to death life is an endless, nerve-wracking struggle
with the dice loaded against them; there is no lasting joy and peace and safety
and comfort to be found here, so they make religions out of stoic acceptance and renunciation –
which at least lightens the burden somewhat – and looking forward to a good
afterlife. I belong, increasingly with advancing age, to the group that is
convinced that, though early suicide is not a healthy idea, it is bad to want
to live too long, and if you can look forward to something better after death
or at least a peaceful extinction, why not? We can certainly assert pretty
strongly that neither great scientific advancement nor great expansion of
material luxuries nor vast social-engineering experiments such as those in
early 20th century Russia and China have made human beings happier
on the whole; maybe the very idea of creating paradise on earth will always be naïve
and self-defeating. There are some people who will be able to find happiness in
the midst of chaos and suffering and horror, but they will always be the lucky
few: you cannot really make philosophies on their basis. There will always, as
well, be some people whom nothing can
make happy, not even the latest available psychiatric therapies. And of course,
there will always be people who keep fooling themselves that they are happy –
you have only to think of drug-sodden party animals the world over. The less
thought wasted on them the better: they would have mattered not at all,
socially speaking, if they had not wasted scarce resources on a huge scale and
set very bad examples for the gullible young of successive generations to
follow.
It is true that the average man or woman, if they can think
at all, will aver that they do want
to be happy above all else. It is also true that most great philosophies, some
of them thousands of years old, have agreed that, besides trying to cope better
and better with natural calamities (as science has helped us to do to some
extent), happiness can come only from trying to control our worst impulses –
the seven deadly sins – and being nice to our fellow humans, or at least tolerant
and forgiving and helpful wherever possible. But if there has been so much
agreement among the philosophers, why has it been so difficult to instill and
spread those values among all humanity? – I think one part of the answer lies
in the fact that our worst instincts are so deeply hardwired into the genes
that most people find it impossible to do as directed, even if they have become
civilized enough to pay lip service to those ideals (how many can, or like, to
meditate and give in charity and not abuse power to assert authority regularly?
How many monks and nuns, even?). Another part is that we limit our loftiest
ideals to people ‘like us’ – so slaves or women or blacks or children or Jews
or the very poor do not deserve to be treated according to the same standards.
Alas, the deprived sooner or later rise in revolt and fight back, bringing in
their train more and more unhappiness (the oppressed have a habit of turning
oppressor). So it has always been, at least over the last few thousand years.
Maybe more toleration and understanding and mutual goodwill is slowly spreading worldwide at last,
but I am not too hopeful: certainly not for the next two or three generations.
Yet another part is that far too many people – and that
includes lots of ‘educated’ ones and people in power – are fundamentally and
incurably stupid, in the sense that
they simply cannot see that in others’ welfare very often lies their own, at
least in the longer run. So we shall all happily cheat one another all the time
in the course of all kinds of transactions (including keeping promises), never
realizing that we are ultimately creating a society where nobody can really
trust anybody else, and that would be a nightmare for all. Without going as far
as Dickens or Schiller or Russell, I shall say from my own experience that
sheer stupidity has always been a far bigger factor in making or keeping people
unhappy than is intellectually admitted… look at Duryodhan, or America in
Vietnam or Afghanistan, or the broad failure of the cooperative movement in
industry and agriculture everywhere.
The last part – or what I would call the last for now – is
that while dominant values, wherever preached, generally tell everyone to ‘be
good’, there is a lot of silliness combined with hypocrisy and impracticality
mixed up with the good advice for those at the receiving end to take them
seriously, or be able to live up to them for any length of time. Think of
schools telling girls and boys ‘don’t think about the opposite sex’, or parents
lecturing children about ‘studying all the time’ or godmen telling us we cannot
go to heaven if we eat such and such kinds of ‘impure’ food, and you will get
what I mean.
Things get far more intractable when we take into account
the fact that lots of people – highly influential people, too – don’t seem to want to be happy at all, leave alone let
others be happy. One very wise man has said ‘Men can tolerate a great deal of
unhappiness, especially the unhappiness of others’, another has said ‘Who wants
to be happy? Only the Englishman does’, yet others have variously said that the
true goal of life should be not happiness but fame, glory, money, or power, and
indeed, demonstrated how earnest they were by not only ruining their own lives
in pursuit of those goals but those of enormous numbers of others, too
(remember all the would-be world conquerors from Sargon to Hitler; all the
numberless people who have died early and nasty deaths in their desperate hurry
to become super-rich). Given such
obstructions, even the most highly enlightened people down the ages have
discovered that it is not easy to make the mass of their fellow men happy:
Confucius and Socrates and the Buddha tried, and the results are there for all
to see.
I personally think – generalizing from the entire range of
my adult experience, which is forty years long now – that these are dark ages,
speaking in terms of values that those below forty have learnt and are
learning. This is not to say that I look nostalgically back to any mythical
Golden Age in the past: the moment I remember slavery and witch hunts and
torture as widespread and socially sanctioned entertainment such idiocy goes
out the window. There has never been a golden age. But every age has its own
sickness, and ours consists of a combination of four diseases: perpetual distraction, laziness as an
aspiration, obsession with self-assertion (as opposed to self-improvement) and
slavering worship of wealth. The moment anybody starts talking about lost
values, I try to figure out quickly whether s/he, from whatever I know about
her or him, is afflicted by even one of the four: if I am sure that is the
case, I know that there is no point in furthering the discussion; let the
physician heal himself first. But of this I am now sure – it is really a waste
of time arguing how important values are when everything ‘bad’ that is
happening all around us, from the epidemic of dirty language to soft porn
masquerading as modelling and music and acting, to vast business scams that
make overnight billionaires to marriages breaking up right and left,
schoolchildren cheating in examinations, judges being bought, college graduates
being unable to spell, women learning to be just as badly behaved as the men
they profess to despise, ‘depressed’ teenagers committing suicide because their
phones have been taken away, rampant pollution and destruction of the natural
environment… everything, everything stems
from the fact that those four ‘values’ have become all but pervasive, no matter
how much people deny it, how many contrarian sermons are delivered from the
pulpits, how many papers are published from the universities, how many
psychiatrists bemoan the epidemic of things like ADHD, and how many silly
proto-dictators try to rein in the spreading madness by harping ever more
frantically on the need for discipline, duty and higher loyalties like those to
nation or religion.
Is there a cure? I don’t know. As one of my gurus said, it
is important to spell out the problem even if I cannot offer a sensible
solution for it. May better people try.
Which way are we going, then? God alone knows … or, as one
of the Upanishads says, ‘maybe even He does not know’!