What
do Elon Musk, the Taliban and rigid Gandhians have in common? They do not
believe there has been a population explosion over the last century; rather,
they are afraid that the world is on the verge of being depopulated. Well, Musk is a nut (you don’t believe nuts can become
hugely successful in a worldly way? You have obviously never heard of Howard
Hughes and Adolf Hitler): he believes that we must procreate much more rapidly
because ‘Mars needs us’, whatever that means. The Taliban are much saner in
comparison, they only want an endless supply of suicidal mujahideen. And Gandhi taught his followers there can never be too
many people around, because ‘God gave each man only one mouth to feed but two
hands to work with’. Evidently no one ever explained to him the iron law of
diminishing returns when you have to work with several productive factors in
fixed supply, like land and fresh water and nature’s capacity to recycle toxic
substances, when one factor (namely population) keeps increasing to monstrous
levels (almost nothing to one billion 1800 years; one billion to nearly 8, the
next two hundred years only). I wonder how Musk at least would feel if he were
forced to live in, say, a one-room accommodation in Dharavi slum without a private
toilet and able only to visit a government hospital when he is sick, or to sit
for some job entrance examination where millions fight over a few hundred
vacancies…
Manoj
Jha, RJD member of the Rajya Sabha and a professor at Delhi University, singlehandedly
and greatly raised the prestige of Parliament as the ultimate representative of
the people on Tuesday the 21st July by delivering an eight-minute
apology (maafinama) to the entire
country for the untold misery and loss visited upon us during the long
pandemic, blaming all governments since Independence for the pathetic situation
we find ourselves in today (attention to public health and emergency management
has NEVER been a priority to any government at the Centre). I hope his speech
will percolate deep and wide into the public mind, and go down in history. I
wish even a single member of the ruling party attending the session had the
guts, the honesty and the empathy with his voters to applaud. Jha was not even
singling out their Supreme Leader for dereliction of duty!
Our
current CJI, it seems, has taken several bulls by the horns by calling the
sedition law a colonial hangover and promising to examine its Constitutional
validity and relevance. In this context, I would like to note, like Jha, that
no government since 1947 has thought fit to remove it from the statute books,
for reasons that should be obvious! (the Supreme Court has also recently expressed
deep consternation that our entire hospital sector is being run like corporate
business, geared only to maximize profits, all ideas of rendering an essential
social service be damned).
Meanwhile,
recent sero-surveys have indicated that close to two-thirds of our population
may have developed antibodies to Covid – which means we are close to herd
immunity – and even Dr. Randeep Guleria, director of AIIMS Delhi, a committed
and passionate doomsayer since early last year, has now gone on record saying
it is high time that schools and colleges were reopened. Will India
soon become the only major country in the world where they will be kept
indefinitely closed? And will any half-sane person claim that that will be
another feather in our national cap?
Here in West Bengal we have created history of sorts by declaring that 79
Madhyamik candidates have jointly stood first (with 599 marks out of 600!!) and
not one of the many lakhs failed. Go figure. It terrifies me to think of what
kind of future awaits these hapless youngsters, especially in the job market.
All
kinds of unconnected musing brought me back to reflect upon the life and death
of Harihar Ray, the indigent itinerant priest who was father to Apu in Pather Panchali, and died ‘unhonoured,
unsung’ and virtually unwept in Varanasi, far away from his native
Nischindipur. In this age of absolutely virulent and vicious insistence on reverse
caste- and gender entitlement, there are still good men, poor Brahmins, who
live simple, honest, hardworking lives, quietly doing the humble best they can
for their wives and children until they drop dead, and they vanish without even
a public eulogy: who cares? Not even their own families for very long: Apu
neither shed tears nor remembered by the time he got married. While all around
us we can see the most privileged (and often worthless-) children of SC, ST and OBC folks who have already got the
best of all possible worlds – father IAS, mother successful surgeon, luxury
accommodation, fancy cars, five star dinners, holidays abroad – and still
getting every kind of unearned advantage from school to college to jobs and
even seats in legislatures, so much so that getting at least an OBC certificate
through fair means or foul has become one of the fastest ways to social
advancement for hundreds of thousands, and then being resentful whenever
anybody even insinuates that they got it all because they were born in a lucky
time, because their ancestors were badly treated, sometimes many generations
ago… many years ago certain expert committees urged the government to cut out
this ‘creamy layer’ at least from all such entitlements, and the CPI(M) alone
among all political parties has always insisted that affirmative action should be
based solely on the criteria of economic and educational deprivation, but no
one has ever bothered to take them up in any meaningful way. And one last
question: why should someone, who has been allowed to get through school on
much easier terms than his peers, continue to get similar advantages through
college and in the job market? By greatly relaxing entry requirements for our
future doctors, teachers, judges and civil servants, are we benefiting the
nation in any way at all?
Our
sins and follies are deep, old and toxic.
5 comments:
Dear Suvroda
Thank you for highlighting Prof. Jha's speech. I missed it. You are much closer to reality than I am, but this issue has dented the confidence of an entire nation and its people (including people who live outside and have connections). I mean of all things we could not ensure hospital beds to people who needed them! It indeed is a failure and we cannot probably hide behind the fact that "we are poor nation" when for long we have been fed stories of growth and glory. Whatever may be the story but the fact is, we are seeing off an elder generation who will never get back to normal life and we are raising a younger generation who may have prolonged confidence issues. It indeed is sad. I think people who live in denial even now should wake up and do something.
Regards
Tanmoy
Dear sir,
is it not wise to consider whether or not the caste system itself perpetuates domination of men in society? That doing away with it altogether may be a wiser alternative. Continuing to hang on to it might only harbor meaningless squabbles in the guise of caste based discrimination. The practice of promoting caste based marriage in itself may be considered a social ill as it perpetuates genetic degeneration instead of breeding out bad genes. One cannot exactly posit a return to the purdah system as progress of women's rights, after all.
Yours sincerely,
Diptokirti Samajdar
Ha! 'Doing away with the caste system'. Infinitely easier said than done, as many of our greatest reformers have found out to their deep chagrin over the last several thousand years, including, I seem to remember, a fellow called by his friends the Buddha.
Dear Sir,
I've read some people claim that the world population will cap off at nine billion or twelve billion and then start decreasing. The fertility rate worldwide has been on a downward trend, with even countries like China's going down below the replacement rate (of 2.1). In India, it's been going down too, across all demographics, thankfully. I do wonder, with people living longer, and shrinking working populations (such as in Japan, which has an inverted pyramid of way more older people being supported by a relatively fewer younger people), how social services (healthcare, pensions and so on) will be affected. Regardless, as population increases, resources are bound to become a problem, and so is managing and recycling waste of all sorts.
I am pleasantly surprised at how the Supreme Court seems to have suddenly woken up from its slumber and been spurred into action over the last year-and-a-half, especially since the pandemic struck. They've been berating state and central governments for not dereliction of duty, discussing freedom of expression, the pointlessness of sedition laws, and it's a refreshing change after some of the recent scandals.
I had mentioned in our conversation that in the UK, keeping schools open was a priority for the government. They have a provision now to test students (for Covid) twice a week in classrooms. Households can get packs of the Rapid Antigen Test kit delivered for free and keep testing themselves, taking appropriate measures if positive. The measures are not foolproof: some students figured out that lime juice can result in a false positive and they can get days off! If one student tests positive, anyone else who came in contact has to isolate too and it results in unnecessary absence. It's not perfect, but they are trying whatever they can to keep schools running.
[continued]
[continued]
In recent times, I have read a fair bit about reparations in different contexts: Shashi Tharoor made a case for India from the Brits, people in the US have raised the issue for black people, the Aborigines in Australia have suffered terribly and now live in the fringes of society. In India, the problem with the caste system runs deep and I read every news article about some sort of atrocity with disbelief, the most recent one being a bunch of anti-socials from an “upper” caste hurling abuses at Vandana Katariya outside her house for not winning a match! The issue concerning reformation and reparation is very complex, but the way we are going about it is simply not right. People make the case for equality of opportunity being more appropriate (and necessary) than equality of outcome (which, some argue, is more totalitarian). But the latter is way easier to implement (quotas at higher levels, such as university and jobs), and so the government adopts the path of least resistance and hopes it will, in addition, garner them more votes too. Taking the easier route is so pervasive, it seems difficult to get rid of. I'd attended a conference organised by ONGC once. An attending expat professor, who lives in France now, had asked them very bluntly why they aren't able to solve some of the problems which researchers elsewhere have, effectively. The defensive and distasteful reply was that they are spending “lakhs of rupees” to that effect, in outsourcing all the work. This enraged the prof and he said he was referring more to investing in real research and development in house (which will take time and effort), make lucrative offers to those who have obtained degrees and gained experience outside to bring them back in, instead of just outsourcing all research work.
My interest in the Olympics has surfaced, as it does for most Indians, for a couple of weeks once every four years. I just feel terribly sad seeing our players and teams (many of whom are from impoverished or minority backgrounds) putting in so much effort, having made tonnes of sacrifice in their lives, somehow managing to obtain a bronze or a silver, while tiny nations like Japan and poorer ones like China pile the medals on. I have nothing but reverence for the players for what they have achieved against all odds. My sadness lies in the fact that a week later, they'll fade away from our collective consciousness for the next four years. I really wish someone or some entity could take the initiative to invest huge sums of money to scout and nurture talent, build an institution to promote all these diverse sports, not just for the sake of the Olympics but in the hope that we become more sportive as a nation. A senior Norwegian colleague of mine was in the 1988 Olympics rowing team that won the Silver medal! After that he decided to live the mundane life of a Geophysicist. The US and the UK on the one hand and China on the other have problems of their own. But they have certain traits as a nation which I find admirable and enviable, and I do wish we could inculcate some of their best ones.
On that wishful note, I'll stop.
Sincerely
Nishant.
Post a Comment