Let
me start off by saying that the ‘introvert/extrovert’ binary is not as simple
as it sounds. Take my own case. When I was a boy, two very opposite things were
true about me – I loved to talk, I almost always had lots of things to talk
about (one primary schoolteacher dubbed me a chatterbox), and at the same time,
I was morbidly shy in strange company, especially when they were adults. With
my friends (and when I was young I had quite a few) I could be chummy enough,
but circumstances dictated that I was thrown upon my own resources most of the
time, so most of my time was spent reading and daydreaming and swimming and
watching movies and cycling around all by myself around the town. So where
would you put me on the introvert-extovert continuum? As I grew up, I
discovered even better that I could talk well when I wanted to, even among
large groups, even on stage, and obviously as a teacher – anyone who has tried
to coach people of his own age while still a teenager will know just how
difficult that is. At the same time, I began to abhor adults already, not
because I was actually shy any more, but I was discovering with ever growing
disdain how ignorant, foolish yet opinionated and patronizing the average adult
was (this included everyone from parents’ friends to professors and my nominal
superiors at the newspaper office, and as I grew older, my contemporaries and
increasingly people far junior), how quick to take offence if their silliness
and ignorance and crudeness was exposed even accidentally (and more and more, I
began to do it very deliberately, because I was touchy, and getting sick of
such presumptuousness, and enjoyed rubbing their noses in the dirt). That
applied very strongly to parties – before I was in my late twenties I began to
hate having to rub shoulders with people whose average IQ, GK as well as
manners (courtesy, consideration and dislike of noisiness, to name just three
things that were becoming more and more essential to me) were vastly inferior,
whose taste in jokes was poor at best and vulgar at worst, who were only
constantly measuring one another in material terms and either preening or
burning with envy, whose smiles were quite apparently plastic, who scorned my
success and scoffed at my failure, who would never be of any use to me,
material, intellectual or spiritual, many of whom, I knew, were speaking
falsehood and ill behind my back even while uttering oily platitudes to my face
if they thought their ‘interests’ required it. So I began to avoid
socialization as a matter of principle – the last party I went to in a hotel
was in 1993, I can count on one finger how many weddings I have attended in the
last twelve years, and I never invite
people in any significant number to dinner.
Classic
introvert? Well, how does that explain my success as a teacher, then? Thousands
who have been through my classes will remember fondly how much they enjoyed
themselves here. Some of that was indeed due to the fact that they found me to
be a far more attentive, understanding and sympathetic listener than most
teachers are (again, sign of a typical introvert – but then, are such people so
rare in this country?), but some of it was certainly because I entertained them
so much in so many ways, and no teacher can be like that without being at least
a very successful pseudo-extrovert,
which I mentioned in the previous post. So I am proof that it can be done.
People who have seen me holding classes in thrall for years and years will find
it hard to believe that I am an introvert at all. So all those introverts out
there who are reading this, take heart: if you badly want to do it for the sake
of some specific purpose, you can do it with sufficient resolution and
practice, over time, though your essential character won’t change. I will
always like both large numbers (but only when they are ready to listen to me)
and small, intimate one-on-ones, but I will never be the life and soul of any
party, nor do I want to be.
As
for what happens in my classes. Ever since I started teaching large batches (by
which I mean any number more than ten) I have seen two things going on
simultaneously. You must remember that pupils come to me after they have
already had nine or ten years of schooling at least, so some bad habits are,
alas, too deeply set for me to do much about it. I keep telling them you cannot
learn a language without speaking it, and most of them have pathetic speaking
skills, despite the fact that they go to so-called English-medium schools,
fundamentally because oral exams have never been given seriously in school, and
because most teachers themselves speak at best a pidgin English these days, and
do nothing to encourage English speaking in class. I want them to answer
questions and ask them – the more the merrier – but most of them are
desperately averse, either because they are too lazy to listen to lectures or
do homework (so where will the questions come from?) and too uninterested in
any kind of serious learning, or because they are morbidly shy of being laughed
at by their peers: which happens only too frequently, even though the peers
themselves are no better, and have no right to jeer and titter. Try to hold any
kind of elocution session, or debate, or extempore speaking class, and they are
desperate to hide behind one another; very, very few participate eagerly.
Telling them how important a skill public speaking will prove to be in later
life is like beating your head against a wall.
Juxtapose
this with the fact that left to themselves (and often even while a class is in
session) they chatter loudly or in whispers, incessantly, compulsively, and
most of their chatter is pointless drivel – they don’t even listen to
themselves, and don’t remember what they themselves said five minutes ago. I
know, I have checked a thousand times. So what are these kids, introverts,
extroverts, or something else entirely? Simply creatures who lost their minds
and sense of direction and purpose a long time ago? I know too, now teaching
kids whose previous generation was in my class, that most of them will stay
that way for the rest of their lives…
There
are a few genuine introverts, always – quiet, observant, thoughtful, interested young people – and it is for
them that I feel bad, because, given the large numbers, and the distraction
caused by the too numerous other type (I have to waste far too much time
keeping them on a tight leash), I cannot reach out to them as well as I would
have liked to, though God knows I have tried very hard. I know some of them
wish to get closer, be better attended to, and learn more, but leave a little
disappointed. I wish, though, that they too would do their bit, try a little
harder to communicate with me. A few have, over the years; they are the ones
who remember thoughtfully and gratefully, and keep in touch even though decades
roll by. The rest forget within days or weeks of the classes being dissolved.
My only consolation is that they pay their fees, and the numbers keep coming
year after year. Maybe a time will come soon when I will be able to sort and
sieve, and retain only the former type in my class after the first three
months… for again and again, a thousand times over, it is this type that has
made it all feel worthwhile.
I
wish Susan Cain had seen some classes in Indian schools and colleges before writing
that chapter. And on Teachers’ Day, after 38 years of it, I cannot, alas,
convey a general love, benevolence and admiration for the student community any
more. It has been too long.
6 comments:
Sir,
This post and the previous one at least give some heart for those who are unnecessarily branded as a separate breed, by virtue of being introvert. Thanks for clarifying the difference between "introvert" and "shy".
Regards
Dear sir,
I remember an incident from my childhood which might now seem to be a bit anecdotal, but nonetheless, cogent with regard to your post. I was a dreamy-eyed, frail shade of a boy of my age then (six or seven years old). My parents had decided to shift my schooling to St. Xavier's School- Durgapur, which was then an abode basking in glory. After I had breezed past the written tests, I had to face an 'interview' of sorts, with the principal (the first interview of my life, as I come to think of it now).
Father Wauvreil asked me about my hobbies and then told me to interpret some actions displayed in some simple illustrations and pictures. I could only murmur some faint, barely audible noises as answers. At some point of time, he even asked my parents, sitting beside me, to comprehend what I was uttering and also suggested some vocal exercises. But, he had kept being jovial to me throughout the ordeal.
This was embarrassing to me, since I was the same boy who was a popularly-selected class-monitor at my previous school and my report cards classified me as a "very talkative" character, as remarks from teachers. So, was it a xenophobia?
I have always felt an affinity to wander around in the recesses of my mind, but without being too withdrawn from others around me. I feel that the assimilation of the ideas, images, and sounds that a person absorbs every day, along with the sense of wonder surrounding those bits and pieces, is what causes someone to be labelled as an "introvert".
--------------
Regards,
Sayan Roy.
I feel so calm after reading this post,as well as the previous one. Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I love how you write and have read a fair bit of posts on this blog. Am now heading over to listen to Cain's Ted Talk... :)
Dear Sir,
I can only speak for myself that I used to be quite the introvert, but when it came to specific events for eg extempore or debate at school I would switch into extrovert mode quite easily. Just as an interesting aside, I was once talking to the school assembly for the morning speech and afterwards some teachers came to me to tell me that I had done a 'good job' (How I hate that word in the current lexicon!), you told me that I stood a bit leaning to the left and could correct my stance. I wish I had more guidance like that, in general in my life. Back to the blog post, I heard her TED talk and found it quite personal and interesting. I disagree though, on the stance of modern psychology trying to fit everyone into boxes. I don't think there is one or the other type, but rather a hybrid 'form' and circumstances (specifically parents and the living situation) create these sharply polarized types. To generalize to say that all introverts are intelligent would be simplistic bordering on falsehood. But yes, thinking deeply about the world requires time, energy and peace of mind, things that have become increasingly rarefied in modern society thus increasing the population of extroverts who are by nature directed outwards and must seize every morsel of opportunity.
Subhasis Chakraborty
Sreetama, Sayan, Aparna and Subhasis, thank you all for commenting. As I have said time and again, it is hearing from thoughtful readers like you that I find most rewarding, and I can never have enough of it. And though I have criticized this or that detail about Ms. Cain's book, I would strongly urge you to read it yourselves. Aparna, especially, I am glad that you have finally gotten round to commenting. I hope it won't be the last time!
Sir,
Thank you for this post. As a quiet girl, i was always called as an introvert both by my parents and by my friends and so there was a label stuck on me that i was so. That resulted in me having very less or no friends at all. I remember that in my 8th grade when i first spoke out for my oral impromptu in front of the entire class, the teacher even started to clap because of my speech and henceforth everybody in the class who knew me as a 'scary introvert' got out of that blur and started trying make me as my friend. I talked well with everybody (and even more now) even with the bullies and i talked a lot. I even discovered that I had a pretty good sense of humor ,too. So I'm a pseudo-extrovert and now i know that being that is not bad.
With regards
From Anwesha.
Post a Comment