Explore this blog by clicking on the labels listed along the right-hand sidebar. There are lots of interesting stuff which you won't find on the home page. Also listen to my stories on YouTube. Just type in Suvro Sir or Goppoguchchho.
Seriously curious about me? Click on ' What sort of person am I?'

Sunday, January 04, 2026

Jolly LLB 3

I just watched a new Akshay Kumar movie on Netflix: Jolly LLB 3. I have grown to like this fellow, for all his slapstick and earthiness and splayed-tooth laugh - there is a kind of decency, sincerity and social urgency about many of the roles he has played that appeal strongly to something in me. I have enjoyed movies like Airlift, Toilet: ek premkatha, and OMG. Better in many simple but touching ways than much of the pretentious trash we see on screen these days. 

The storyline, though, is what really had me glued. It is about how filthy rich land sharks are gobbling up large pieces of our rural hinterland at throwaway prices, and that too with money borrowed from public sector banks (certainly not their own mehnat ki kamai, as the lawyer demonstrated in court), then 'developing' these places at enormous profit to build an airport here, a golf course there, a mine elsewhere and a luxury housing estate somewhere else. Very often they abuse the 'system' in every way they can on their way to piling up their ever-bulging fortunes, from co-opting public servants to bribing and threatening and occasionally even killing off those who stand in the way, be they journalists or the police, judges, recalcitrant villagers or NGOs helping them. And always, their slogan is that someone must 'sacrifice' a little so that the country can 'progress', as long as the sacrificers are the poorest and most vulnerable. Indeed, such is the logic of capitalism that they have the most hotshot lawyers and journos and even the occasional lawmaker to argue plausibly and strenuously on their behalf, for very hefty fees, of course: there is an 'eminent professional economist' on their payroll in this movie who has done very nicely for himself by selling 'expert advice' to his clients.

The movie was made in feel-good style, so the bullet-hit district magistrate arrives on a stretcher to give damning testimony in court, the lawyer duo plead earnestly, cleverly and convincingly, the ageing and trouble-avoiding judge, goaded beyond endurance by the tycoon's offensive arrogance (can you actually call a judge a clown and and idiot to his face in open court in India, however rich and powerful you are?), gives a stern and just verdict, the project is abandoned, the determined old woman who had stubbornly fought for her rights is shown respect and compensated to some extent, and the villagers celebrate with Holi colours, so all is hunky dory.

The good thing about the movie is that such a story can still be told in India, where it comes so close to reality in criticizing the kind of shameless and rapacious crony capitalism that has now taken root. And, well, Netflix has not (yet) been ordered to take it down. This is the kind of movie that can open many eyes, especially in a country where so many of us prefer to stay blind for as long as we can (indeed, so many of us have been conditioned to admire and salivatingly fawn upon such robber barons as great 'success stories' to be hero worshipped). The sad part of reality is two-fold. One, a mere district judge's verdict can easily be overturned in a higher court if you have the right kind of money and connections - that is how our 'democracy' functions. Two, most people are so trivially affected by such stories that the effect does not last beyond a few days or weeks, so there is little hope that, regardless of the good intentions of the storytellers (I deeply admire their idealistic perseverance), it will create the kind of lasting public awareness, caution and outrage which can permanently put shackles on the kind of vastly powerful predators who today absolutely dominate our society. Haven't such stories been told before? Remember Rang de Basanti and 3 Idiots?

P.S.: Surprising and most ticklish irony - the movie has been financed by Star Studios, a subsidiary of Jio Star, and everybody knows who is the head honcho of Jio. He financed the film?! Why on earth?

5 comments:

Rajdeep said...

Your response to Jolly LLB 3 is both appreciative and unsentimental. You enjoy the film’s decency and social intent without being taken in by its comforts, and your reading of “sacrifice” and “progress” neatly exposes how dispossession is normalised—lawyered, economised, and morally sanitised. The “eminent economist” figure, in particular, feels uncomfortably close to life.

The feel-good resolution, too, sits uneasily with reality. The brave judge, symbolic compensation, and celebratory Holi belong to cinema; in life, verdicts are overturned and justice is quietly exhausted by money and connections. And your reminder of how quickly public outrage fades—despite earlier films like Rang de Basanti or 3 Idiots—lands with sobering force.

Your postscript, though, is the most incisive point. That a film condemning predatory capitalism is financed by the very forces it critiques is not an irony so much as a revelation. Power today is confident enough to bankroll its own criticism, precisely because it knows that critique, once aestheticised and consumed as “content,” can be safely absorbed without consequence. When dissent is permitted, streamed, and even applauded, it poses no real danger.

Perhaps that is why such films are still allowed to exist. Their function may no longer be to unsettle power in any lasting way, but to offer momentary moral reassurance—to let viewers feel troubled, even righteous, before returning to a system that remains firmly intact. And yet, as your post suggests, they still matter: not because they change the world, but because they remind those who remain uneasy that their unease is neither naïve nor solitary.

Suvro Chatterjee said...

Hmm... your explanation is quite probably the right one, Rajdeep. And that is why it is so frightening.

Aditya Mishra said...

Dear Sir,

I am not too surprised by the fact that a certain media house is financing films of a certain kind, even if it means going against what is considered to be their core ideology. Our public isn't wise enough to catch onto this, and those media houses care only for good financial numbers. This explains the recent announcements of war/patriotic movies, from filmmakers who've never done anything remotely close to this, because those same media houses found that particular genre gave the best RoI.
I remember that during Op Sindoor, a certain subsidiary of the company you've mentioned above found itself in trouble for moving too early to copyright certain terms and names related to that whole incident.

For these guys, money is important(nothing wrong with that, according to me). Therefore, they will pick and choose anything that gets them good viewership. While it does promise some amount of variety for the viewers, it also underscores that ultimately it's about the moolah. No matter what irony plays out, I hope we get good stories and scripts out of that. Indian filmmaking has remained too subpar in my opinion. One reason could be the fact that most people wouldn't want a movie that requires some amount of thinking and deep introspection. I hope it changes.

Best Regards,
Aditya Mishra

Suvro Chatterjee said...

Reading your last paragraph, Aditya, the only thought that crossed my mind was, how cynical can we (Ambani, you and I) get?

Aditya Mishra said...

Sir,
Whle I may not be able to comment on either Ambani or you with a great deal of authority, I believe he may have a few reasons to be that way. On one hand, having so much wealth makes him an easy target for people trying to fleece him or make a quick buck at his expense. Even with those circumstances, he still has to place his trust in others. Or I may be wrong, and with the amount of money he has, being a cynic does not mean much to him at all, since he lives in an insulated world that we get to observe in its raw and original form. He, on the other hand, probably sees it only in lifeless data. The city does appear beautiful from the top floor of a skyscraper.

As for me, I am a known cynic in my family. They have tried to reason with me, but I will not budge from my view of the world. It is entirely based on my experience with people. Although I do realise that too much of it can lead to antisocial behaviour, and I try to keep clear of that. In my case, my cynical attitude towards people stems from the fact that I have observed many individuals and noticed a recurring pattern.

On the other hand, you have daily interactions with students, and I wonder if that is the reason you are able to recognise some good in people. I remember you making a similar statement in one of your recent posts, about how humanity, on average, is not particularly good, but that moments of goodness in individuals still exist. I believe that this may be our only hope against the darker aspects of the world.

I apologise if this took off on a completely different tangent, but these were my first thoughts in response to your question.

Best regards,
Aditya Mishra