Explore this blog by clicking on the labels listed along the right-hand sidebar. There are lots of interesting stuff which you won't find on the home page
Seriously curious about me? Click on ' What sort of person am I?'

Monday, May 22, 2023

Strengthening democracy

When I think about things we can do to ensure that democracy survives, improves and flourishes in India throughout the foreseeable future, the following, it seems to me, have become absolutely urgent.

 

We should drastically amend the Representation of the Peoples Act and other basic laws to provide that

1.      Political parties cannot proliferate endlessly, with almost indistinguishable manifestos and differentiated only by their leaders who fight and drift apart from mother parties to satisfy their own egos, ambitions and narrow interests,

2.      Make the Election Commission a truly powerful and impartial body, supervised by Parliament alone (with a strong voice for the opposition which the ruling party cannot steamroll), which will monitor all political activity of all parties and not only just before and after elections,

3.      Parties must be commitment bound to deliver on at least most of their pre-election promises or resign from power, and no party may criticize government policies which it itself espoused strenuously while in power,

4.      Electoral constituencies must have the power of recalling their representatives at any time after the first year if they turn out to be duds, frauds or downright criminals,

5.      Serious and repeat offenders of a criminal nature (which must include election fraud) must be permanently barred from standing for elections,

6.      All parties must fully and honestly publicize their sources of funding, itemized in case of all large donations, and parliament and courts must stringently monitor which donors are being unlawfully favoured when those parties are in power,

7.      All legitimately recognized parties must be publicly funded, at least up to 80% of their needs, and allow compulsory audit of their finances.

8.      The Constitution must be amended to spell out very specific rules about how elections and politics may be done, and the High and Supreme courts must exercise unceasing, strict and minute supervision over the whole process, perhaps assisted by a public ombudsman.

9.      Illegitimate, coercive muscle power must be removed from the political arena by an all-round consensus among all contending parties. Investigative agencies must not function at the whim and behest of executive authority, but only under parliamentary and court supervision, with stringent media oversight.

10.  The mass media must commit themselves to genuinely fearless, probing, analytical and impartial reporting,

11.  Accredited, well-respected, well educated social workers must be encouraged to join politics en masse after they have made their reputations in their chosen fields of service,

12.  The well-off elite with time and leisure on their hands must be encouraged likewise to join public service, so that they are not easily lured by the temptation of misgoverning to make big bucks quickly for themselves and their kin.

13.  All political parties whose agenda openly spread lying and hateful fiction about their perceived ‘enemies’ in society must be put beyond the pale, once and for all, whether they are on the left or right, religious or atheistic, whether they are feminists or misogynists, casteists and vegans or those who want to kill casteists and vegans.

14.  Civil society NGOs with good and long-standing reputations must be strongly encouraged to take a hand in the political process (in this context, read this article).

15.  All elected leaders, from town councillors to PMs, as soon as they start behaving like kings and despots, must be summarily removed from office as soon as a minimum number of genuine complaints have been registered, which may vary from 100 in case of a panchayat pradhan to 100,000 for a prime minister.

16.  Since the permanent rather than elected executive actually runs the day to day administration and deals with all citizen needs, requests and demands (sarkari naukars, from the peon right up to the department IAS secretary), and since they have acquired a deep, abiding and countrywide reputation for being incompetent, unwilling, grossly unhelpful and venal on the whole, all political parties must come together to remove or cure this scourge once and for all – a sarkari naukar will work hard according to well defined standards day in, day out round the year all his working life, to be judged only by his clients and supplicants, or be first warned, then suspended, then dismissed, and finally in extreme cases jailed. There is no other way of clearing this particular Augean stable without making a frightening example of a few tens of thousands of careers and lives ruined. It has gone on for far too long.

17.  Voter education must be made a very serious and compulsory part of school education right from class 6 to 12, so that when they start choosing their candidates, they may not vote like ignorant or brainwashed idiots (as even most college graduates do in this country). This ‘education’ must clearly teach growing generations what they should ask of their elected representatives, as well as what they should not ask or expect.

18.  Much more power should be devolved down to the states, and further onwards to the lower units of local self government, so long as they commit formally that they are all going to obey the Constitution, never dream of seceding, and accept a minimum template of duties and commitments to the voters that has been set by higher levels of government – indices that can be constantly monitored, measured and commented upon, like crime rates and literacy rates and employment rates and pollution levels, to mention just a few.

19.  Absurd, out of date and utterly anti-democratic laws like the sedition act must be repealed and thrown into the dustbin of history. Every citizen must be free and unafraid to air his views on any subject of public concern, as long as her views are reasonable and informed.

20.  Learning from the best practices of all nations which are widely recognized as successful democracies must be made mandatory for all who dream of being our future leaders.

 

Achieving all this will take time, but a beginning must be made, now. Even ten years later it might be too late, and democracy might dissolve into first anarchy and then autocracy, as it has often done in many countries.

Achieving all twenty of the above will be very hard, and all of them may never be fully achieved. Also, in the off chance that they are indeed all achieved, it still won’t make for a perfect democracy – nothing is ever perfect, certainly not something as complex and messy as a democracy of such gigantic proportions – but India will certainly become a much better place to live in.

The whole question is whether a sufficient number of intelligent, wise, civic minded citizens are at all keen enough to preserve and improve democracy in India. From what I have seen over a period of nearly fifty years of observation and reflection – I have been politically conscious from a very early age – I fear that that might not be the case. If that is true, democracy in India is doomed, and, despite being one who is painfully aware of the drawbacks of democracy, I would opine that that would be a disaster for almost all of us.

One last word.  I first wrote out a similar list of desiderata in 1987 to help out a friend who was going to sit for the UPSC examinations. Thirty six years on, I have found little reason to make major changes in the list – indeed, I wrote this one out almost off the cuff. Shows both how little India has changed in the intervening years as much as how stable my own opinions have remained.

[It should be obvious to any mindful reader that I do not side blindly with any single existing political party or ideology. For instance, much that the TMC or BJP are currently doing might be wrong or bad or simply misguided, but I know and remember too much of the CPIM and Congress eras to imagine naively that everything will be hunky dory if only they can return to power, having learnt nothing about honest and good governance in the intervening years out in the wilderness]

8 comments:

Koustav Bhattacharya said...

Sir, don't you think it's high time India adopts a two party system, given that most regional parties are either promoting a particular dynasty or catering to a particular vote bank? A two party system will ensure an unfractured opposition and a government that is kept on its toes.

Suvro Chatterjee said...

A good idea at first glance, but on deeper reflection: Americans, who have been trying the two-party system for 200+ years hardly celebrate its 'merits', and India, I think, is far too big and complex for it to have any chance of working at all.

Aveek Mukherjee said...

Dear Sir,

Interesting recommendations. The one on big money flooding the political process made me ponder a lot. This is something we should all be concerned about - regardless of political point of view- who wish to protect the tenets of the world's greatest democracy, a government that is supposed to represent the population as a whole and not just a handful of strong vested interests. The political power of magnates goes much deeper than their campaign contributions and their ability to influence elections. As a result of their ownership of the media and elected leaders, they influence public opinion and domestic and foreign policy in a way that most people don't realize.

I agree entirely with you when you say that local authorities must be empowered. The organisational structure of local administrations must be revitalised and strengthened.

However, I think the EC must be monitored by the Supreme Court along with the Parliament. I would like to know your views on this.

I share your feelings on voter education. I am appalled when people we consider educated are influenced by religious and nationalistic politics.

The dissatisfaction with democracy around the world makes me wonder what India has in store for us. However I remain an active optimist.

Regards,
Aveek

Suvro Chatterjee said...

Thank you for taking time out to reflect, Aveek. I wish many more of my readers would do that.

Since we met and talked after you wrote this comment, we have, I trust, discussed things over to your satisfaction. For the record, I do sadly believe that like America, we have been turning into a plutocracy rather than a democracy over the last few decades. However, as you rightly say, we should keep hoping...

Swarnava Mitra said...

Dear Sir,

There is something that I would like to add to this list - stronger anti-defection laws to prevent the kind of horse-trading that is evident in politics today.

I strongly agree with your point about voter education. I think it is the most important point. A good democracy is built from the ground up, and this requires inculcating democratic ideals at the ground level. This is essential for every voter and will require more than a school education. Campaigns should be arranged for the already adult voters as well.

Far-reaching social changes usually require inspiration from strong visionary leaders ("philosopher kings", in the words of Plato). Therein lies a paradox, governments with a single strong leader tend to diverge from democracy. As long as the dominant ethos in politics is attaining and maintaining power, steps to strengthen democracy will always take a back seat. As you noted, no government in the last seventy-five years has repealed sedition laws.

Yet small changes do take place and one must not lose hope.

Sincerely,
Swarnava Mitra.

Nishant said...

[continued]
Point 13 is funny in a dark way. Thanks to social media, things seem to become polarised faster and to extremes. I wish voters and the media could focus on matters that are of actual concern, such as education, jobs, wages, roads, policies, things that have an actual impact on lives. But it so much easier to stay ignorant and focus on meaningless things, helped in no small means by the media, all of it just benefitting the parties eventually. I think the blame for this lies entirely on us, the people, the voters.

Considering how many party supremos have despotic tendencies, it wouldn't be in their interest to pass such a law (Point 15). We gained independence and became a democracy but I feel that since it was, in some sense, “imposed” upon us, rather than the majority wanting it (like in the US or France, maybe), we still think of the government as rulers and ourselves as the subjects. In truth they should be answerable to us and “fear” us, not the other way around.

Bureaucracy is built into every fibre of France and yet I did not have to pay a single cent in bribe for anything. Things took time but one just had to have the faith that they will happen. From getting a driver's license to moving houses to subscribing for new power and water connection, there were tonnes of trees to be felled in terms of paperwork. But I never had to pay anymore than was the requisite amount. I used to get anxious in the beginning. But then I learnt to have faith (and patience).

An American colleague and I had a discussion once about having to pass a test to be eligible to vote. Of course, that opens several cans of worms. Access to and quality of education, the means to it, presence of a critical media which also helps towards this education. Social media might have held the promise “democratisation of news”, but all I see now is people trapped in their own echo chambers, dog whistling to each other and having their previously-held opinions and beliefs reinforced.

In countries like the UK, the devolution of power works remarkably well. A podcaster once mentioned that for all their dislike of Nehru and (Indira) Gandhi, the present dispensation embodies the worst aspects of each: the top-down approach of Nehru and despotic tendencies of Gandhi! He did mention something about people in power not having the money and those with money not having power (referring to the local Corporator and MP/MLA) or something to that effect. What I understood was that things seem to be difficult in India, even in principle. Please correct me if I am wrong.

If I am not mistaken, even Pakistan struck down the sedition law recently. In the UK and the US, they do have the Official Secrets Act and the Espionage Acts, respectively to prevent state secrets from being leaked under the garb of free speech. In the US, there's always a tug-of-war between the two. But that might also be because it is one of the few countries where free speech goes as far as it can. I personally am quite awed by it. In India, a potential joke (let alone an actual, spoken one) could be considered seditious. A “thought crime”, so to speak: have we made any civil progress at all?!

When I speak to some Indians about Point 20, they say that we are much better of than some other countries, such as Germany, because Swastikas and Mein Kampf are banned there. I am left shaking my head and sighing.

I apologise I have only skepticism and negativity to contribute. Your point-wise list made it easy for me to vent. This might have been the longest, most uninterrupted venting session I've ever had. I too would consider ourselves extremely lucky if we could ever get somewhere close to where the US, Canada and Western Europe are, in spite of all their flaws and failings.

Sincerely
Nishant Kamath.

Suvro Chatterjee said...

To Swarnava,

As you say, we can only keep hoping. Also, you know how much I adore the idea of the philosopher king as an ideal and fear it as a reality! As men are, politics has usually always been a 'dog's life without a dog's decencies'!

To Nishant,

I am glad I could encourage you to vent :) Did I, by any chance, miss an earlier part of your comment? If so, will you send it over once again, please?

Nishant said...

Dear sir,

You seem quite optimistic, given that the amendments you would like to see (and your hope for change) have remained the same since the late eighties! I have read and seen much less and yet I feel overly despondent. In one of the podcasts, the host made a very simple, yet insightful, observation: politics is ultimately about making the lives of people better. Improving lives is the last thing I think of when I think of politics.

I wonder if the anti-defection law was made keeping Point 1 in mind. Although it seems to have caused zero tolerance for internal dissent and democracy within the party. Point 3 seems reasonable but I feel these slick politicians would use any wiggle room, which might be in place for legitimate causes of failure, to blame their failings on, for instance, someone who died seventy years ago. I also doubt any party, given how incompetent, corrupt and greedy they are, would approve of such measures.

There are these things called Townhalls, which are held regularly in he US, wherein the representatives present their work and take questions from the constituents. In India, the politicians would think such a thing to be outrageous. They are called public servants but they act as rulers and expect us to behave as subjects rather than citizens.
[continued]