I
hear from my boys in class that some so-called teachers in that school where I,
for my sins, taught for fourteen years
are still abusing me behind my back,
seventeen years after I quit – futilely, it goes without saying, because they
are too dense to notice that what they think and say about me hasn’t mattered
one whit to my professional reputation. The real reason is of course only impotent envy, one of the basest, and alas, most common of human
emotions, especially if those humans are middle class Bengalis. They have said
many ugly things about me in the past; now, apparently, all they can think of
to revile me is that I ‘teach’ my pupils to ‘disrespect’ their parents. It
could be brushed away with a derisive laugh of the Bertie Wooster vintage, but
let me do them the honour of taking cognizance and analysing why I should do
such a thing if I do it at all…
One
reason I might behave like that (and have been apparently doing so for donkey’s
years) is that I am simply mad. An interesting conjecture, really, and one that
not a few have toyed with. If I am, there’s no help for it at this late date.
But I wonder if it is possible for a madman to be professionally successful –
and that too in a sober job like teaching – and if it is, shouldn’t madness be prescribed for young people who are
aspiring to be as successful or more so?
But
just suppose I am not mad. Why, then, should I ‘teach’ youngsters to disrespect
their parents? Won’t the word spread far and wide soon enough, and seeing that
it is the parents who pay me, won’t they get miffed enough in bulk to see to it
that their wards stop attending my tuition: my only source of bread and butter
for all these years? Why, instead, have the numbers kept swelling over the last
two decades to the extent that my real problem is having to handle too many
people, and making many of them unhappy by having to turn them away? If I did
teach my pupils to be disrespectful, how have I managed to keep that a secret
from the parents for all these years – a secret which, curiously enough, lots
of schoolteachers in my town are
privy to?
Then
again, most of these wiseacres forget that I have been (quite a successful-)
parent myself. My daughter attended my classes like any other pupil for several
years. Naturally I dealt with them the same way and said exactly the same
things to all of them: and look, my daughter has not grown up to ‘disrespect’
me! Which means that I either don’t ‘teach’ them anything like that, or that I am a very poor teacher, doesn’t it?
I
teach English, which involves not only dealing with the prescribed textbooks of
the ICSE syllabus but also handling things like grammar, comprehension and
composition. In the course of such things, I discuss many things with my pupils
indeed, so that they can understand their texts well and learn to express
themselves intelligently, coherently and in a well-informed manner. Among
hundreds of subjects, the issue of parent-child relationships certainly crops
up now and then, as for instance when we discuss what to write in an essay titled
‘Teenagers should be given more freedom’, or ‘Parents always know best’. I tell
them to think and write in a rational, balanced manner, taking note of what
keeps happening in the real world, so most of them agree with me that though
parents may as a rule have their children’s best interests at heart, that is
not a universal truism – many parents can be very bad parents – and even the
most well-intentioned parents may not always know what is good for their
children (like mothers who never allow their children to go out to play, and
ply them constantly with junk food), and some even give highly anti-social
lessons to their children (‘always put your self-interest above those of
others, never share your notes!’), which goes a long way to making anti-social
adults of the next generation. Then there are stories in which we actually have
to read about very stupid or nasty or indifferent parents, such as when we
discuss David Copperfield’s guardians, or Harry Potter’s – and there was this
story by Mrinal Pande called Girls in
the ICSE syllabus some years ago which showed how women in the household can
oppress girl children, and, in the current syllabus, how Jessica in The Merchant of Venice hates her father Shylock
for being a cold-hearted, money-grubbing monster, or Hans Christian Andersen’s
story The Little Match Girl, where
the beggar child freezing on the street doesn’t dare to go home because her
father will beat her if she doesn’t bring any money, or the woman in T. S.
Arthur’s story An Angel in Disguise who
died of a stroke as a result of ‘idleness, vice and intemperance’, and who took
so little care of her children that the neighbours agreed the children would be
better off in a poor house. Yes, while dealing with such things, I do rub it in
that just giving birth to children doesn’t qualify you as a good parent; you
have to achieve that status through much learning and very hard work. When I am
doing that, I am trying to make a better generation of parents for the future:
I am saying ‘respect’ should not be taken for granted as an automatic
privilege, it must be earned. Isn’t
that a big part of what a teacher is supposed to do?
Also,
I have heard all my life about real-life parents who scald their children with
hot irons or throw knives and cleavers at them as a way of ‘disciplining’ them
– the wonder is that in this country most children grow up to forget such
horrors, or forgive their parents, or come round to believing that that is
indeed the right way to bring up children. Now while I do NOT believe in pampering
children – my daughter has been brought up under a pretty strict regimen of
do’s and don’ts – I have also always believed that such creatures are not
parents but perverts, and should be locked away: most people in this country
might not know this, but they indeed are, or their children are taken away to
foster care, in all civilized countries. My own daughter has been taught ever
since she became capable of thinking that if your father behaves like a
monster, he stops deserving respect as a father; treat him like the monster he
is. Aren’t we all aware that in this country lots of parents are spendthrifts
or irresponsible drunks, many parents sell off their girl children or marry
them off underage or force them into early labour, and other horrors too awful
to mention? Whom are we fooling when we pretend not to know such things? What
kind of future India are we building by telling our children that they should
‘respect’ us regardless of our faults and crimes – indeed, that it is forbidden
to even think that we, being parents, can have any faults at all? Aren’t many
of the millions of criminals in jail right now parents too? Should they, too,
be respected?
And
there is something else that I try to teach my youngsters in this connection –
that ‘respect’ involves courtesy and consideration, though never unthinking
deference and obedience. I see too little of courtesy and consideration from
youngsters to their elders in this country, within the family and outside:
evidently that is not what they are ‘taught’ at home or in school. In many
countries, young people are taught much better to yield a seat in the bus or
train to any elderly person, not just to their own parents, not to push ahead
of them in queues or shove them aside while walking, not to use loud and vulgar
language in the presence of much older folk. I wish our parents and so-called
teachers tried teaching such good manners. I should, if I like to think of
myself as a gentleman (or woman), treat all elders with courtesy and
consideration, even while not listening to everything they say, when I know
they are saying foolish or wrong things, as they sometimes do. Isn’t that something
we elders should try to teach our young more strenuously?
So
yes, though I do not bring up such issues unless we are doing something
directly connected to the syllabus and question papers they would have to face,
I do indeed talk in a rational, factual, un-hypocritical way about parents and
children and what the ideal relationship between them should be like. Some
children, I hope, learn good lessons from me, some don’t; some parents know and
approve, some don’t: I really don’t care, because I have the backing of the
best authorities, philosophical, legal and pedagogical, behind me as well as my
own conscience; it has never hurt my professional interest, and you can’t teach
an old dog new tricks – this is the way I have worked all my life, this is the
way I shall go on working till the end, cocking a snook at all my pathetic
detractors.
But
I have a theory about why insistence upon blind parent-worship is so strong in
this country. Shall I tell you?
Well,
let me save it for a future blogpost…
1 comment:
Dear Sir,
Any adult human being who regards all parents as automatically worthy of deference should be immediately tagged as someone who is incapable of parenting. I think most of them fail miserably to gain even a tiny modicum of respect from their peers, relatives and friends and hence turn to their children as the last refuge for extracting the kind of respect that they vainly believe they deserve. I am sure you have noticed that this sort of blind obeisance is being advocated heavily in India nowadays. Bharat Mata has to be unquestioningly respected; nobody should be allowed to talk ill about the Indian Army under any circumstances; even paraplegics must stand up in cinema theatres when the national anthem is being played. Encouraging this sort of mindless reverence is an effective way to keep away a large mass of our society from critical thinking. If teachers like you persuade young minds to think for themselves and value rational, informed, and unbiased analysis over base emotions that society forces them to swallow, such teachers should be encouraged and applauded. Of course, this can be hugely problematic for unfit parents who have not done anything remotely respectable in their entire lives, a category I suspect most of your petty detractors belong to.
Thanks,
Joydeep
Post a Comment