While
reading the storm of posts on Facebook and Twitter over the pros and cons of
our PM’s demonetization drive, I was reflecting upon the kind of people who
have grown up and become ‘educated’ in India over the last thirty-odd years,
correlating with my own long experience of teaching a very large number of such
people when they were in their teens over the same time period. Several
thousand of my ex-pupils are in the 25 to 45 age bracket now. Here are some
broad generalizations I can make about them, and hardly any of these are
complimentary. Do read them with patience and see whether you agree on the
whole, even if it makes a bitter pill to swallow. Of course I acknowledge exceptions,
and know about many of them myself, but remember that by definition the
exceptions don’t count for much: how a society behaves depends by and large on
the common type.
1) If they have good
internet access and are comfortable with chatting/posting in English (even if that
is very clumsy, stilted English interspersed with vernaculars), they belong to
a very privileged minority. How many would they be? Twenty, thirty, fifty
million at most?
2) And yet they have an
overblown sense of identity and entitlement. They believe they speak for all of
India – many are affronted if it is suggested that they don’t even know much of India. They believe
‘national progress’ is coterminous with what they want.
3) They ape Americans in
everything except the good and important things. So – as I have pointed out
once before – artificially tattered jeans, short skirts, ‘cool’ slang and
chewing gum and rock music and fast cars/bikes and jingoistic chest thumping
yes; hard work, cleanliness, love of greenery, charity, respect for the law,
punctuality, keeping promises, courtesy to strangers, quietness in public and
support for libraries, museums and research facilities, no no.
4) They like to think and
act as though they are informed, intelligent, independent beings, but – and
they hate to hear this – they loathe learning and reasoned argument, they form
opinions quickly then steadfastly ignore all evidence to the contrary, they are
driven by emotion of a very violent, febrile, evanescent kind and the herd
instinct in everything, whether it be
choices relating to cinema or music, clothes, food, politics, subjects of formal
study and career preferences, ‘status’-symbols and what have you. In addition,
two other factors drive them powerfully: tradition (best observed when it comes
to marriage – look at how powerful issues of caste and dowry and ‘correct
dressing’ still are) and advertizing (right now they all want iPhones and
compact SUVs because they all want iPhones and compact SUVs, or so they learn
from the ads and the all-important peer groups, outside which they rarely
venture).
5) They are intensely
patriotic – which means they hate Pakistan and revile any Indian who finds
fault with Indians (numerous quotes from Vivekananda, Tagore, Gandhi and
Ambedkar would make them froth at the mouth!) – and that seems to go very
comfortably hand in hand with slavering over dreams of migrating to the US, or
at least getting jobs with US multinationals, as well as being totally
uninterested in knowing about their own land, its history and culture, its
flora and fauna; with littering streets right and left, with being utterly
callous about doing things that can improve the lot of one billion Indians who
suffer from age-old neglect and exploitation. No matter whether they are male
or female, whenever they talk about freedom, rights, equality and all that
stuff, just observe how they treat their domestic help, waiters at restaurants
and attendants at shopping malls, or how much they care about disturbing
neighbours while enjoying themselves.
6) They worship big
money, no matter how it is made. So any startup zillionaire, even if he has
made his pile selling discount coupons or gutkha over the Net, is much more a
hero to them than a freedom fighter, a teacher, a social worker or a writer
(indeed, it is this class which, having read virtually nothing outside textbooks
and comic books, admires Chetan Bhagat, Ravinder Singh and E. L. James as
‘writers’). That admiration, however, is mixed up with a lot of envy and secret
anger, so if you are rich (and famous), you quickly learn to keep such
‘admirers’ at arm’s length in your personal life.
7) They are out and out
opportunists, talking big wherever they feel completely safe and ‘in’, as when
trolling anonymously on social media, and slavishly kowtowing to power
everywhere else, knowing full well which side of the bread is buttered, and
being truly passionate only about keeping their own skins safe. Best
exemplified by the committed socialist at JNU who became a committed neoliberal
overnight as soon as prospects arose of getting a scholarship from the
department of Economics of the University of Chicago. So they have no problem
with turning coat every other day and always saluting the rising sun. They are
all devoted to Narendra Modi as long as he wields the levers of power: one big
defeat of his at the hustings and they’ll say ‘Narendra who?’
8) When it comes to
religion, they are divided into two broad groups – either they blindly conform
to lokaachaar, no questions allowed, or
they equally blindly condemn all things spiritual as troublesome and useless
nonsense, without making any attempt at studying and understanding any religion
in depth. Makes for a weird and volatile mix.
9) They are bone lazy and
they compulsively over-eat (look at the obesity epidemic, and count the number
of young Indian tourists as opposed to white skins who prefer to trek or cycle
rather than hire cars). They are also materialistic in the crudest possible
sense: look at the kind of movie that always makes a hit with them; look at how
they go gaga over cricket rather than, say, hockey; look at how many books they
buy as opposed to cellphones, jewellery, liquor, clothes and beauty care; look
at the way, too, they are painting the walls of their houses these days!
10)
In a country where
very little pathbreaking scientific research is ever done, they are all currently
obsessed with technology – the word
being restricted narrowly, of course, to consumer gadgets, virtually all of
them developed in one tiny corner of the planet very far from India. Am I seriously
wrong in comparing this with any other form of hard-drug addiction: that most
tell-tale sign of empty and pointless lives?
This
is the human material we are dealing with, whether we are small-town teachers
or prime ministers. I handled their like as pupils twenty five to thirty years ago,
I am handling them as parents now. Is it likely that any serious national
progress can be hoped for, progress as understood by the finest minds our
country has produced?
In
To My Daughter I have touched upon
this malaise in passing. Reading Pankaj Mishra’s new book Age of Anger brought these thoughts back to the fore. And it has
occurred to me that making sense of the present chaos all around the world
requires profound, sustained, intensive reading of the kind that the people I
have described above – in India, especially, but to some extent everywhere –
have lost both the desire and the capacity for doing.
3 comments:
Dear Suvroda
I completely agree with your assessment. What bothers me most is that there is tremendous amount of intolerance in accepting alternate views. While everyone mock the idiocy that journalist like Arnab spread on Indian television, but most of them are like that in real lives, in their minds and on social media. I saw a photo of a long queue of people at office hour, waiting to get their free Taco on opening of some new snack shop at Gurgaon. It did not surprise me and I am sure they are the ones, who comment on social media how queues in banks are such a waste of time.
I am sure India being a huge country must have intelleigent young people as well but unfortunately I hardly come across them. To be honest, this is one of the reason why I stopped commenting on websites, facebook etc because I do not wish to be insulted by intolerant faceless maniacs.
To add to the list of gadgets, these days I see everyone is a photographer par excellence as well with no less than DSLR,s.
God bless them and their heroes.
Regards
Tanmoy
Dear Baba,
I want to add to the second point you made about these youngsters thinking the world of themselves and their ideas and sense of identity. My peers in college - between the ages of 18 and 23 mostly - live in a bubble where they believe that their opinions matter more than anyone else's and are therefore bound to be earth shattering. And most of them are perfectly content with the bubble; they have no intentions of finding out what the world out there is like. Yet there is the unending rhetoric about liberalism and egalitarianism. Everybody has the right to opine over everything under the sun and cannot be mocked or derided no matter how uninformed or utterly moronic they sound. The irony is, these are the very people who are easiest to get offended by any opinion that does not match their own and make a great song and dance over 'political correctness'.
Also, Tanmoy Da is spot on about DSLR owners who think of themselves as superb photographers. I giggled a little when I read that bit!
Pupu
Ma,
Thank you for commenting on this blog after a long, long time :)! I, of course, would be a little more forgiving of your peers, firstly because this is just the age for that sort of thing, and secondly because if they are at fault, much of the blame lies with us, the parents, for not bringing them up better. I am much more irritated by people ten, even twenty years older, who are still behaving like overgrown children.
As for the DSLR thing, I have been laughing about it myself for years now, as you know. Now that just about anyone in our class can buy a gizmo like that, and it automatically makes one an ace photographer, I have limited myself to my cellphone camera, and I don't talk about my photographic skills any more.
Baba
Post a Comment