A
lot of slightly educated people believe technology alone has made the modern
world. The truth, as always, is considerably more complex. Four other factors
have played a major role: ideology (think, for instance, of
democracy and socialism – as society changing powers, they are hardly three
centuries old), organization (think
factory system and corporate structures, which divided risk, vastly increased
and standardized production scales, and put millions into regimented
employment), advertizing (hundreds
of millions are simultaneously, daily, constantly told what to buy, from soap
to processed food to education to healthcare to entertainment, lifelong, until
they quite forget what it means to make independent choices) and the miracle of
compound
interest.
Few
middle class people from non-business families really understand the power of
sustained saving. Here’s a sample of what it can do for you. At 8% annual rate
of interest (that’s roughly what you get at present from the PPF, income-tax
free), compounded quarterly, you get Rs. 52,485 on an initial deposit of Rs.
1,000 after 50 years. Check out the figures for yourself here. Imagine, now,
you are depositing Rs. 1,000 – yes, just 1,000 – every month for fifty years,
and I leave it to you to figure out the kind of money you will have at the end
of that time. A serious saver will put aside much more than a mere
Rs. 1,000 rupees a month. And other kinds of savings are far more profitable. The
BSE Sensex has grown 280 times since its inception in 1980. Which means that
someone who invested Rs.100,000 in it at start has Rs. 28 million now.
Of
course, interest rates will not always be 8%, and they might be compounded
half-yearly, or even yearly, in which case the yields will be considerably
less. On the other hand, there are times when yields are much higher – in the
1980s, when I started saving in a very small way, the Indian banks were
offering interest as high as 14% on long term fixed deposits. Admittedly, that
was a very special period; interest rates have never again been so high
anywhere in the last 250-odd years. In fact, during the time when many people
got seriously rich by saving and investing – say, the merchants in Europe
during the early middle ages, or when the British-Indian government was raising
funds to build the railways – the long-term interest rate on ‘safe’ investments
ranged between 3 and 5 per cent. But that didn’t stop long-term savers from
getting rich.
Why did relatively so few people get rich over time, then? Well, partly because too
few of them ever had anything to save
– historically, 90%-plus of populations lived from hand to mouth – and partly
because of those who did, only a tiny fraction ever bothered to save in a
sustained, long-term manner (that is just as true today as it ever was!), and
some were unfortunate enough to have their lifetime savings washed away by
accidental disasters, such as disease and war and hyperinflation. The key is
time and diligence. Very few people with the ability to save do save month after month, year after
year, for entire lifetimes, especially knowing that with humble beginnings,
that process has to carry on for several
generations for families to get seriously rich. But that does not change
the fact that, apart from those who strike gold, only long-term savers get rich.
These days, for obvious reasons, people are fascinated by the stories of those
who became wealthy almost overnight, the sports celebrity- and Rowling and
Zuckerberg types, but the fact is most of the richest folks in the world are
those who ancestors have been saving assiduously for centuries. What fascinates
me is the story of the Medicis, Fuggers and Rothschilds, or the Indian Chettiars
in the south who financed Rajendra Chola’s expeditions to Sri Lanka more than a
thousand years ago, or the great Jain seth who hedged his bets by lending to
both Rana Sanga and Babur before the battle of Khanwa. Their descendants
are still among the richest people on the planet, though, unlike the insecure
and attention-hungry nouveau riche, they avoid hogging the headlines. Such men
can truly paraphrase the poet and say ‘Kings may come and PMs may go, but we go
on forever!’ And it’s all due to the miracle of patience harnessed to compound
interest. Ask the Marwari community elders. Of course, looking at the way their
descendants are burning money now, it’s a safe bet that many of them will be
out on the streets pretty soon. There are laws of history that you defy only at
your peril. You can do your own research on this.
So
it frightens me to think that economic basics are going awry in a
historically-unique way all over the world. And as with almost everything else
that is bad, it’s America that has shown the way. Interest rates have dived so
far that in some countries the banks not only don’t give you any interest at
all on savings, they actually charge a negative interest on it, meaning you are
penalized for saving. Simultaneously the credit card economy has led millions
of not-too-well-off people to live far beyond their means, saddling individuals
as well as whole nations with such enormous debt burdens that no one knows how
it will ever be repaid. The motto seems to be ‘sacrifice the future for the
sake of today’ – carpe diem pushed to
a monstrous extreme. It reminds me of a horror story written, if I remember
correctly, by Isaac Asimov, about a man who borrows so much that he has
exhausted his credit limit, but he is so addicted to living the high life that
he cannot stop splurging, and the bank persuades him to carry on, provided he
signs off his son’s future too: the son will be born with an inherited debt
burden, and spend perhaps his whole life trying to pay it back. That’s the
story of bonded labour all over again, and repeating itself in a highly
‘advanced’ society! The long term implications are mind-boggling, and not just
at the individual level. With China buying up trillions of dollars of U.S.
debt, there may soon come a time when the Chinese own a significant enough
portion of the American economy for major political decisions on behalf of
Americans to be taken not in Washington D.C. any more but from Beijing. It will
then probably be the first bloodless conquest of a major nation in history
since Ashoka’s dharmavijaya of Asia
began…
No comments:
Post a Comment