A female
ex-student, now in her late-20s, had this exchange with me via email very
recently. She, as you will read (still, though maybe not much longer-) claims
to have some respect for me. After having read very closely, do tell me what
marks you will give me if I were being judged as her teacher: how much of my
values (leave alone my knowledge) have I been able to transfer to her? I have
no objection to being given poor marks, mind you: if the teacher has failed,
it’s largely his fault, after all…
the only thing is that comments should come solely from those who have known me
well, and for a long time, and like to
think things out in depth before shooting their mouths.
Dear Sir,
This mail
is in response to your blogpost ‘What happened in Guwahati?’ dated 18th
July 2012. With all due respect Sir, and to say the least, I was surprised to
read a post of the sort on your blog of all places. The comments on the post
are even more startling. I am not a bra-burning feminist trying to rip apart
every male in sight, but I also find it difficult to come to terms with a
school to thought that blames the wallet owner than the pickpocket, on grounds
that the victim should be more careful of his belongings!
A certain
Sunandini Mukherjee writes, ‘Most girls
love to draw people’s attention towards them, put on clothes and attitude which
are not really decent for that purpose but then feel ‘insulted’ on being
greeted by lewd comments by loafers on the road.’ Really? I wonder; is that
really why I dress the way I do? And do I lose the right to be offended by
people, who have no semblance of etiquette, thanks of the length of my skirt?
Is dignity defined by the droop of my décolletage or the rise of my hemline? I
have not judged women who step out of their homes in salwar kameez and oiled
hair, then what has given them the right to judge me? Sir, I have taken your
classes very seriously, and a lot of things you told us have stayed with me
till date. I shall also take the liberty to say it has shaped me in many ways.
You spoke about the real meaning of independence one day – ‘Do as your heart
pleases, as long as your actions do not bother, adversely affect or hurt
another.’ So then, what is wrong if a 20-year old girl or for that matter a
young man, decides to go out drinking with his/her friends late in the night?
Should an ideal society not flourish on the tenet of Live and Let Live?
While the
media angle is a different topic altogether (I completely agree with you Sir
that TRP reporting has become today’s norm, and it is shameful. Personally I
have written a letter to Mrs. Ambika Soni in a hope to be one more voice
against sensational journalism.) I also wonder if it is such an eyesore to see
youngsters behave like, well, youngsters. Which teen does not falter, have
lapse in judgment, and make friends only to realize later in life that they
were probably not worth their while? Why is there such an expectation from
scholars, intellectuals and litterateurs that 20 somethings should behave,
think and operate like them? I know most great men started young, and that is
inspirational. But let’s face it, not everyone is meant for great things. The
world is made up of all kinds of people and the world better make place for the
average man. It’s no sin, according to me.
P.S.: This
is just my point of view and I felt a strong need to share it with you. Hope
you make space for it, Sir. I didn’t send it in as a comment, because I was not
sure if you would like it.
Regards,
X
Thank you,
X. We might talk about this again, if I am around, in say twenty years’ time,
preferably when you have a teenage daughter growing up at home … I shall take
the liberty of observing for now, however, that you do NOT read my posts with a
tenth of the attention that I demand from my readers. And that is hurtful at
best, and offensive at worst.
Sir
Sir,
I am sorry
if I have offended you in any way. That was not the intent.
X
Good to see
that, at least, X.
In response
to your angry question, here’s a poser.
I too, like you, say nothing about women who step out of their houses in salwar
kameez and a lot of oil in their hair. So they shouldn’t say anything about how
I dress either, right, especially in my own house? So would it have been perfectly
all right if I took my classes all these years in my underwear? Or do
different standards apply to men and women here (and one standard for teachers
and another for all other men?): women have a ‘right’ to be free in how they
dress, whereas men don’t? And am I a very foolish conservative if I say that I
can quite understand why 99% of parents wouldn’t have wanted to send their kids
to my classes?
I notice
also that you very carefully stepped aside the challenge that I threw at you:
that I would like to talk to you again about this when you are raising a
teenage daughter… and don’t give me nonsense now about how mothers have to be
careful about their daughters in this society full of bad men, please. If you
insist on your rights you must carry the responsibilities that come with it
(like it or not), and you mustn’t suddenly change tunes when you have your own
daughter to bring up…
All evil
springs from people insisting upon rights while denying the concomitant
responsibilities. I have an unchallengeable right to stay naked only in my own
house, and only when I am completely alone. At
all other times, my right must be restricted by how others feel. Even if I am in no danger of getting raped.
Otherwise I am telling all others, including my maidservant and my wife and my
daughter ‘You are not human; your opinions don’t count’.
Having
typed that much, I already have this sinking feeling that I have wasted my
time: you will not do me the courtesy of taking time out to think, really
think about what I said. Anyway,
I won’t try again.
Sir
No Sir, you
did not waste your time. I understand that not everyone will share or agree
with my point of view. I respect your opinion, but that said, I am not sure
your respect mine Sir. You have already made up your mind that any
counter-discussion from my side will be ‘nonsense’. What I intended to do with
my mail was to merely have a healthy exchange of views (I believe such a thing
can happen even if opinions clash) But I fear Sir that this attempt of mine has
only offended you. I apologize for putting my disagreement forth.
X
Just one
question for the reader: was this girl ever actually interested in a ‘healthy
exchange of views’? (for those who might be curious, I was merely using what is
called the ‘Socratic method.’ Took the
first step would be more accurate,
because I couldn’t go any further.)